JurídicoESEN
Order (Auto)July 26, 2006

A- de 2006

The official text of this ruling is in Spanish and is shown as published by the Colombian authorities.

Reporting justice Manuel José Cepeda Espinosa

✓Claimant Andres Delgado Ortega Como Agente Oficioso Vs. Cajanal

✓
Topic · hard data
Solicitud De Adicion De La Sentencia T-295/06. Habiéndose Proferido Decision Que Hizo Transito A Cosa Juzgada Y No Habiéndose Planteado Irregularidad Procesal Que Diese Lugar A La Nulidad De La Sentencia, La Corte Carece De Competencia Para Atender Las Solicitudes De Adicion Y No Cabe Nuevo Pronunciamiento. Rechazada Por Improcedente
01

Topics and subtopics of the ruling

✓What the ruling decides and analyzes, as indexed by the Court's case-law reporter's office. Each topic links to every decision that addresses it.

Nulidad Sentencia De La Corte Constitucional
  • Procedencia excepcional por vulneración del debido proceso
Solicitud De Adicion En Fallo De Revision De Tutela Ante La Corte Constitucional
  • Improcedencia por carecer de competencia en sentencia T-295/06
3 topics · 3 subtopics · source: case-law reporter's topic index
02

What it decided

This decision records no constitutional review holdings. This is common in tutela rulings and orders, where the decision does not concern a legal provision.
·

Operative part (Resuelve)

✓Verbatim text of the decision, as it appears in the ruling. It complements the structured holdings above.

  1. RESUELVE
  2. RECHAZAR por improcedente la solicitud de adición presentada por el ciudadano el ciudadano Andrés Delgado Ortega actuando como agente oficioso de Marina Ardila de Galvis, mediante la cual pretendía que la Corte Constitucional adicionara la sentencia T-295 de 2006, proferida por la Sala Tercera de Revisión de la Corte Constitucional.
Verbatim text · source: operative part of the ruling
03

The bench that decided

We distinguish who appears in the ruling (signature, vote or concurrence) from who probably sat on the Court on that date. The difference is shown by color and shape.

04

How it connects

Each decision is a node in the case-law network: it cites some and is cited by others. Follow the threads.

The document’s networkthe most influential links · node size is how often the Court cites it
constitutional review unification tutela

The indexed topics and subtopics of this decision are above, in Topics and subtopics of the ruling.